A Common Misconception about Stock Prices


I cringe every time I hear a novice investor tell me that they only purchase low priced stocks because they offer higher potential gains. A common phase I hear is "I like to buy $1 and $2 stocks because they can double easily and I will make a 100% profit".

My reaction is to always let these people know that "stocks are priced low for a reason, just as stocks priced high are there for a reason".

Like anything in life, quality is never offered at a discount. When I am in the market for a car, I don't expect to purchase a Mercedes for the price of a Pinto. No pun directed towards Pinto car owners as I am just providing an example.

Stocks are valued at their current market value or perceived value under the current situations. A $1.00 stock is trading at this level because it is only worth this much in investor's eyes. A stock priced at $50 or $100 is trading at these levels because of a quality that the lower priced stock does not have. Institutions, such as mutual funds, will not purchase a stock at $1 based on strict internal rules and fund guidelines. Stocks move based on vast amounts of support from institutions that have the buying power to propel prices 100%, 200% or more in less than 12 months.

A quick study of stock market history will prove that the majority of stocks priced at $2 or less will be de-listed or bankrupt before they ever give an investor a triple digit return. High quality stocks are typically representative of high quality companies that usually have innovative products or services that are increasing revenues and earnings thus peaking institutional interest. I have seen more stocks double or triple from the $20-$50 range than any other price level during the past five years.

A stock going up 25% in one month's time is the same whether it is from $5 to $6.25 or $60 to $75. It happens every year. The novice investor is usually hesitant to buy a stock that is priced at $50 or more as it looks too expensive to the untrained eye. What's expensive to an uneducated investor may be a bargain to an educated investor.

Always buy the stock that presents the highest probability of success based on both fundamental and technical analysis. The price should never matter nor should the lot size. A 25% gain will always be the same whether you buy a $2 stock with 5000 shares or a $100 stock with 100 shares.

I agree that the chances for a quick 25% gain on a $5 stock seems greater than a 25% gain for a $100 stock but it's also much greater for a 25% slide on the $5 stock than it is for $100 stock. Your downside protection is limited with a low priced stock as it can move quickly and present you with an illiquid position that a higher quality stock may not present.

Here is a very basic example:

If you buy a $2 stock and it gains $1 in two months, you now have a 50% gain. But, if the stock falls $1 in two weeks, you now have a huge 50% loss in your portfolio, a number that usually devastates most traders.

If you buy a $60 stock and it gains $30 in two months, you will have a 50% gain. Now, if the stock starts to fall rapidly and is now down $10 in a few days, you still have a chance to sell the stock within 10% of your purchase price and prevent further loss and devastation to your portfolio. You, the investor will most likely be able to spot negative action or red flags and get out quickly enough without the sudden 50% drop that the lower priced stock could blindside you with.

Don't buy a stock based on low prices or a quantity of shares. Always buy a stock based on quality looking towards the fundamentals and technicals and the price and volume action. Study our archives and look at the number of stocks that have gone on to tremendous gains from the $20, $30 and $40+ levels.

Chris Perruna - http://www.marketstockwatch.com

Chris is the founder and CEO of MarketStockWatch.com, an internet community that teaches you how to invest your money with solid rules. We don't stop at just showing you our daily and weekly screens, we teach you how to make you own screens through education. Through our philosophy, you will be able to create your own methods and styles to become successful.


MORE RESOURCES:

Washington Post-ABC News poll
Washington Post, United States - 22 hours ago
This Washington Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone October 8-11, 2008, among a random national sample of 1101 adults, including additional ...


Crisis may spawn big US wealth transfer moves
Reuters - 3 hours ago
The wealthy use trusts to pass on stocks, mutual funds and physical assets such as real estate. The tax rates for such transfers are linked to interest ...


Anxious investors hanging on despite heavy stock market losses
Los Angeles Times, CA - 19 hours ago
... have about half a million dollars in the market, including retirement savings, individual stocks, mutual funds and money market accounts. ...


Siglo21

The financial crisis and the candidates
Siglo21, MA - 10 hours ago
... since the financial crisis has entered a unexplored and terrifying ground, in which the value of almost all goods-houses, stocks, mutual funds, ...


Government should stay within our means
Myrtle Beach Sun News, SC - 21 hours ago
Our stock markets are going in the toilet, and the retirees who rely on stocks, mutual funds and 401(k) income are hurting. Rather than asking how did we ...


Course explores 'Investing for Income'
Independent Press, NJ - Oct 12, 2008
We will explore bonds, high dividend paying stocks, mutual funds making generous distributions and a host of other income-producing investments."


Following the stock market is no game
Stamford Advocate, CT - Oct 11, 2008
The class focuses on educating students about stocks, mutual funds and bonds. Reid says her aim is to teach students to invest early and responsibly. ...


Earning the Boy Scouts' personal management badge
Forbes, NY - Oct 10, 2008
_Explain the advantages and disadvantages of putting money into the following: stocks, mutual funds, CDs, bonds, savings accounts. ...


Our View — Let free market be free
Mankato Free Press, MN - Oct 11, 2008
Why not require the same thing with stocks, mutual funds and other investment instruments? It would be less costly than the current bailout. ...


Morningstar, Inc. Reports Third-Quarter 2008 European Fund Performance
MarketWatch - Oct 7, 2008
Morningstar provides data on more than 280000 investment offerings, including stocks, mutual funds, and similar vehicles. The company has operations in 18 ...

Stocks-Mutual-Funds - Google News

home | site map
© 2006